State ex rel. Craig v. Board of Elections

317 N.E.2d 918, 40 Ohio St. 2d 23, 69 Ohio Op. 2d 126, 1974 Ohio LEXIS 361
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 11, 1974·No. No. 74-902·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relators seek to prevent the respondent hoard of elections from submitting a referendum to the electorate on a zoning ordinance. Respondent’s proposed action is at the direction of a writ of mandamus issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. Thus, upon the basis of State, ex rel. Flannery, v. Sidwell (1970), 24 Ohio St. 2d 74, a writ of prohibition is not appropriate in this case.

Writ denied.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Steen, Oelebeezze, W. BROWN and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Craig v. Board of Elections, 317 N.E.2d 918, 40 Ohio St. 2d 23, 69 Ohio Op. 2d 126, 1974 Ohio LEXIS 361 (Ohio 1974).

317 N.E.2d 918 (State ex rel. Craig v. Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Flannery v. Sidwell
263 N.E.2d 568 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)