State ex rel. Cowan v. County Commissioners
This text of 143 Ala. 181 (State ex rel. Cowan v. County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The demurrers to the petition were properly sustained, and the petition properly dismissed, for the following reasons:
First. The petition to the commissioners court does not show what stock law isi intended to be repealed, but merely mentions “Existing stock law or stock laws,” but does not-show that any stock law actually-exists in the precinct, and, if so, what its boundaries are, nor does it show by what authority said stock law exists. This latter is important, as a matter of description and identification, if for no other reason.
Second. The petition for mandamus shows that the stock district, which is sought to be abolished, exists in only a part of the precinct mentioned, and the prayer is for an election in the entire precinct.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 Ala. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cowan-v-county-commissioners-ala-1904.