State ex rel. Cottrell v. Indus. Comm.

741 N.E.2d 141, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1413
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 24, 2001
Docket00-1871
StatusPublished

This text of 741 N.E.2d 141 (State ex rel. Cottrell v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Cottrell v. Indus. Comm., 741 N.E.2d 141, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer of respondents Industrial Commission of Ohio and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, motion for judgment on pleadings of Industrial Commission of Ohio and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, motion to dismiss of LTV Steel Company, Inc., and/or motion for summary judgment of LTV Steel Company, Inc., motion to strike affidavit in support of complaint of LTV Steel Company, Inc., and answer of respondent LTV Steel Company, Inc. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. All other motions are denied as moot.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
741 N.E.2d 141, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cottrell-v-indus-comm-ohio-2001.