State ex rel. Cotleur v. Board of Education
This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 335 (State ex rel. Cotleur v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is conceded by the parties that the respondent board had the right to reject all bids. The “notice to bidders” provides, inter alia, that “the board of education reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any informalities in the bidding.”
If he is right in his contentions, relator would have been “entitled to injunctive relief.
Since that would be an adequate remedy, the Court of Appeals was correct in denying relator relief by way of mandamus. State, ex rel. Grant, Jr., Exr., v. Kiefaber et al., Montgomery County Planning Comm., ante, 326.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cotleur-v-board-of-education-ohio-1960.