State ex rel. Corona v. Harris
This text of 406 N.E.2d 1120 (State ex rel. Corona v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
App. R. 9(C) provides for narrative statements only “[i]f no report of the evidence or proceedings at a hearing or trial was made, or if a transcript is unavailable* * *.”
Appellant’s complaint does not allege that a verbatim statement of the Juvenile Court proceedings cannot be provided; and appellant concedes that if a verbatim statement exists, there is no need for a narrative statement.
Until it is clearly established that no verbatim transcript can be provided, appellee has no clear legal duty to sign and settle the narrative statement.
For reason of the foregoing, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the mandamus complaint, is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
406 N.E.2d 1120, 63 Ohio St. 2d 95, 17 Ohio Op. 3d 58, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-corona-v-harris-ohio-1980.