State ex rel. Cormick v. Richardson

26 La. Ann. 631
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 15, 1874
DocketNo. 454
StatusPublished

This text of 26 La. Ann. 631 (State ex rel. Cormick v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Cormick v. Richardson, 26 La. Ann. 631 (La. 1874).

Opinion

Taliaferro, J.

This is a suit brought under the intrusion into office act. It was dismissed by the court below for want of jurisdiction, on the ground that the matter in. dispute does not exceed five hundred dollars. The contest is for the mayoralty of the town of Homer. By section twelve of the act of the Legislature of the twenty-first of March, 1874, the salary of the mayor is fixed at “ five hundred [632]*632dollars and no more, with no other fees or emoluments of office.” By this act the mayor is authorized, to act as justice of the peace, and on the part of the relator it is argued that in that capacity he would be entitled to fees for services rendered, the amount of his salary and fees as justice of the peace would exceed five hundred dollars, the petition alleging the office to be worth seven hundred and fifty dollars. This construction we think can not be maintained against the clear explicit language used in declaring that the mayor shall receive a salary of five hundred dollars a year, with no other emoluments of office.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 La. Ann. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cormick-v-richardson-la-1874.