State ex rel. Cooper v. State

660 So. 2d 867, 1995 La. LEXIS 2304, 1995 WL 577670
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 29, 1995·No. No. 94-KH-1550·Published

Opinion

In re Cooper, Jack Lee; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 209-754.

Writ granted; case remanded. The timeliness provisions of C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A) do not apply to motions to correct illegal sentences made under La.C.Cr.P. art. 882, which states that illegal sentences “may be corrected at any time.” State ex rel Foucha v. Cr.D.C., 93-1001 (La. 9/2/94), 642 So.2d 1274; State ex rel. Johnson v. Day, 92-0122 (La. 5/13/94), 637 So.2d 1062. The district court is therefore ordered to address the merits of relator’s claims in accordance with the procedures and guidelines set forth in State v. Desdunes, 579 So.2d 452 (La.1991); State v. Washington, 578 So.2d 1150 (La.1991) and State ex rel. Jackson v. Smith, 578 So.2d 1150 (La.1991).

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Cooper v. State, 660 So. 2d 867, 1995 La. LEXIS 2304, 1995 WL 577670 (La. 1995).

660 So. 2d 867 (State ex rel. Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Day
637 So. 2d 1062 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)
State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Smith
578 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991)
State v. Washington
578 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991)
State Ex Rel. Foucha v. ORLEANS CRIMINAL DIST. COURT
642 So. 2d 1274 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)
State v. Desdunes
579 So. 2d 452 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991)