State ex rel. Cook v. Whitley

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Cook v. Whitley

578 So. 2d 118, 1991 La. LEXIS 1376, 1991 WL 64537

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 23, 1991

DocketNo. 91-KH-0877

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 118 (State ex rel. Cook v. Whitley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cook v. Whitley, 578 So. 2d 118, 1991 La. LEXIS 1376, 1991 WL 64537 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Cook, Michael 0.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial

[119]*119writs, writ of mandamus; Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 24095. The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he has filed on or about March 10, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cook, Michael 0.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial

[119]*119writs, writ of mandamus; Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 24095. The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he has filed on or about March 10, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 118, 1991 La. LEXIS 1376, 1991 WL 64537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cook-v-whitley-la-1991.