State ex rel. Conklin v. Wilson

135 A. 282, 4 N.J. Misc. 1013, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 24
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 30, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A. 282 (State ex rel. Conklin v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Conklin v. Wilson, 135 A. 282, 4 N.J. Misc. 1013, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 24 (N.J. 1926).

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

Por the reasons stated in the opinion delivered at the present term in the case of State, ex rel. O’Reardon, v. C. Franklin Wilson, Judge, &c., the allowance of the peremptory writs asked for by the respective relators will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A. 282, 4 N.J. Misc. 1013, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-conklin-v-wilson-nj-1926.