State ex rel. Conant v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Conant v. Jones

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 22, 1964·No. No. 38365·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator had an adequate remedy in the regular course of the law by appeal to the Common Pleas Court from the decision of the commission under the provisions of Chapter 2506, Revised Code. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Fagain, v. Stork, Dir., 174 Ohio St., 330.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Hover, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Hover, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Relator had an adequate remedy in the regular course of the law by appeal to the Common Pleas Court from the decision of the commission under the provisions of Chapter 2506, Revised Code. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Fagain, v. Stork, Dir., 174 Ohio St., 330.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Hover, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Hover, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

State ex rel. Conant v. Jones, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147 (Ohio 1964).

Pincite

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147 (State ex rel. Conant v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.