State ex rel. Conant v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Conant v. Jones

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 22, 1964

DocketNo. 38365

StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147 (State ex rel. Conant v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Conant v. Jones, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147 (Ohio 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator had an adequate remedy in the regular course of the law by appeal to the Common Pleas Court from the decision of the commission under the provisions of Chapter 2506, Revised Code. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Fagain, v. Stork, Dir., 174 Ohio St., 330.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Hover, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Hover, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Relator had an adequate remedy in the regular course of the law by appeal to the Common Pleas Court from the decision of the commission under the provisions of Chapter 2506, Revised Code. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Fagain, v. Stork, Dir., 174 Ohio St., 330.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Hover, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Hover, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-conant-v-jones-ohio-1964.