State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau

358 N.C. 232, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 578
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau. Read the opinion of the Court — 358 N.C. 539
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 3, 2004·No. No. 596A03·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Appellant on the 20th day of February 2004 for rehearing the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31 and Rule 2, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied. The Court, however, ex mero motu allows the Rate Bureau’s Petition filed on 12 November 2003 to the limited extent of addressing the following issue: Did the Commissioner incorrectly utilize investment income on capital and surplus in determining profit calculations? By order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2004.
s/Brady, J.

For the Court”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau, 358 N.C. 232, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 578 (S.C. 2004).

358 N.C. 232 (State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.