State ex rel. Collier v. Barkdull
This text of 303 So. 2d 325 (State ex rel. Collier v. Barkdull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard the arguments of the parties. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, but without prejudice to petitioner’s rights if any to recover for any losses she may have incurred by reason of failure of her counsel to protect her rights in this litigation.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
303 So. 2d 325, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-collier-v-barkdull-fla-1974.