State ex rel. Collett v. Truax

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Collett v. Truax

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 402

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 15, 1927

DocketNo. 20392

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 402 (State ex rel. Collett v. Truax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Collett v. Truax, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 402 (Ohio 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

ALLEN, J.

1. Section 1436, General Code, is a valid and constitutional act.

2. When the secretary of agriculture acting under Section 1436 of the General Code, in the exercise of a sound discretion, refuses an application for a permit to engage in the propagation of pheasants for commercial purposes, upon the ground that such application is not made in good faith, the exercise of his discretion will not be controlled by mandamus.

Writ denied.

Marshall, CJ., Day, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALLEN, J.

1. Section 1436, General Code, is a valid and constitutional act.

2. When the secretary of agriculture acting under Section 1436 of the General Code, in the exercise of a sound discretion, refuses an application for a permit to engage in the propagation of pheasants for commercial purposes, upon the ground that such application is not made in good faith, the exercise of his discretion will not be controlled by mandamus.

Writ denied.

Marshall, CJ., Day, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-collett-v-truax-ohio-1927.