State ex rel. Coleman v. Criminal District Court, Section G
This text of 572 So. 2d 76 (State ex rel. Coleman v. Criminal District Court, Section G) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Coleman, Anthony; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 282-037.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of Boykin transcript he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the plead-mg which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
572 So. 2d 76, 1991 La. LEXIS 96, 1991 WL 1722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-coleman-v-criminal-district-court-section-g-la-1991.