State ex rel. Coleman v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

State ex rel. Coleman v. City of Wichita

96 P. 1118, 78 Kan. 887, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 170

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 3, 1908

DocketNo. 15,286

StatusPublished

This text of 96 P. 1118 (State ex rel. Coleman v. City of Wichita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Coleman v. City of Wichita, 96 P. 1118, 78 Kan. 887, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 170 (kan 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only argument advanced by the defendant ■city is based upon a quibble over the language of one of the commissioner’s findings that borders upon the frivolous. • The conduct •of the city is utterly indefensible either in law or morals, and judgment is rendered in favor of the state as prayed for in the petition, and for costs. The commissioner’s application for compensation and expenses is allowed, and the stenographer’s bill for attendance, fees and expenses is allowed, all to be taxed as ■costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The only argument advanced by the defendant ■city is based upon a quibble over the language of one of the commissioner’s findings that borders upon the frivolous. • The conduct •of the city is utterly indefensible either in law or morals, and judgment is rendered in favor of the state as prayed for in the petition, and for costs. The commissioner’s application for compensation and expenses is allowed, and the stenographer’s bill for attendance, fees and expenses is allowed, all to be taxed as ■costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 P. 1118, 78 Kan. 887, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-coleman-v-city-of-wichita-kan-1908.