State ex rel. Coldiron v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 1998 Ohio 226 (State ex rel. Coldiron v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 403.]
THE STATE EX REL. COLDIRON, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Coldiron v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-226.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 95-2466—Submitted May 26, 1998—Decided July 29, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94APD10-1448. __________________ Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy; J.C. Shew & Associates and J.C. Shew, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William D. Haders, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1998 Ohio 226, 82 Ohio St. 3d 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-coldiron-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.