State Ex Rel. Cockrell v. Industrial Commission
191 N.E. 790, 128 Ohio St. 468, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 468, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 308
Opinion
It appearing to the court that the respondent herein has filed a return disclosing that said respondent has vacated its order of March 5, 1934, dismissing the application for rehearing and has ordered that the claim of relator be set down for the taking of testimony on *469 rehearing as provided in Section 1465-90, General Code, as prayed for in the petition herein; it is now ordered and adjudged by this court that this cause be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.
Cause dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Ex Rel. Cockrell v. Industrial Commission, 191 N.E. 790, 128 Ohio St. 468, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 468, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 308 (Ohio 1934).
191 N.E. 790 (State Ex Rel. Cockrell v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Goodenough v. Industrial Commission
6 N.E.2d 755 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1937)