State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co.
This text of 2000 Ohio 461 (State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 452.]
THE STATE EX REL. COBB, APPELLANT, v. R.O. WETZ TRANSPORTATION COMPANY; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co., 2000-Ohio-461.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-876 – Submitted November 16, 1999 – Decided January 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-103. __________________ Lancione Law Offices and David Lancione, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission to comply with State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 461, 87 Ohio St. 3d 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cobb-v-ro-wetz-transp-co-ohio-2000.