State ex rel. Cliffview Land Co. v. Maloney

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cliffview Land Co. v. Maloney

166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 45

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 19, 1956

DocketNo. 34734

StatusPublished

This text of 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 45 (State ex rel. Cliffview Land Co. v. Maloney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cliffview Land Co. v. Maloney, 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 45 (Ohio 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The principal error assigned is that the Court of Appeals was in error in determining that relator, under the facts and circumstances as evidenced by the pleadings, testimony and other evidentiary matters, was entitled to the relief prayed for. The relator has filed a motion for an order dismissing the appeal or affirming the judgment, on the ground that respondents did not file a bill of exceptions or have it allowed and signed by the Court of Appeals, the trial court in this case, as required by Section 2321.05, Eevised Code.

There being no bill of exceptions before this court exemplifying the facts necessary in determining the issues presented, the appeal is dismissed. State, ex rel. Heights Jewish Center, v. Haake, 165 Ohio St., 547.

Appeal dismissed.

WeygaNdt, C. J., Matthias, Hast, ZimmermaN, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The principal error assigned is that the Court of Appeals was in error in determining that relator, under the facts and circumstances as evidenced by the pleadings, testimony and other evidentiary matters, was entitled to the relief prayed for. The relator has filed a motion for an order dismissing the appeal or affirming the judgment, on the ground that respondents did not file a bill of exceptions or have it allowed and signed by the Court of Appeals, the trial court in this case, as required by Section 2321.05, Eevised Code.

There being no bill of exceptions before this court exemplifying the facts necessary in determining the issues presented, the appeal is dismissed. State, ex rel. Heights Jewish Center, v. Haake, 165 Ohio St., 547.

Appeal dismissed.

WeygaNdt, C. J., Matthias, Hast, ZimmermaN, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cliffview-land-co-v-maloney-ohio-1956.