State ex rel. Cleveland v. Pub. Util. Comm.

655 N.E.2d 185, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1406
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 4, 1995·No. 95-946·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion of Ameritech Ohio et al. for leave to file memo contra relators’ motion for reconsideration and to expedite, and motion by Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company for leave to file memo contra motion for rehearing. Motions denied.

Douglas and Wright, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Cleveland v. Pub. Util. Comm., 655 N.E.2d 185, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1406 (Ohio 1995).

655 N.E.2d 185 (State ex rel. Cleveland v. Pub. Util. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.