State Ex Rel. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Vickery

152 N.E. 907, 114 Ohio St. 716, 114 Ohio St. (N.S.) 716, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 331
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 27, 1926
Docket19659
StatusPublished

This text of 152 N.E. 907 (State Ex Rel. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Vickery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Vickery, 152 N.E. 907, 114 Ohio St. 716, 114 Ohio St. (N.S.) 716, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 331 (Ohio 1926).

Opinion

This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer to the petition and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the demurrer be sustained for the reason that the record in the cause which the relator is asking this court to certify on the ground that the Court of Appeals has found its judgment therein to be in conflict with the judgment of another court of appeals heretofore, upon motion, has been ordered certified to this court.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same is hereby, denied and petition dismissed.

Writ denied and petition dismissed.

Jones, Matthias, Day, Arren, Ktnkade and Bob-i-Nson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 N.E. 907, 114 Ohio St. 716, 114 Ohio St. (N.S.) 716, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cleveland-ry-co-v-vickery-ohio-1926.