State ex rel. Cleveland Right to Life, Inc. v. State of Ohio Controlling Bd.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cleveland Right to Life, Inc. v. State of Ohio Controlling Bd.

137 Ohio St. 3d 1425

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 5, 2013

Docket2013-1668

StatusPublished

This text of 137 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (State ex rel. Cleveland Right to Life, Inc. v. State of Ohio Controlling Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cleveland Right to Life, Inc. v. State of Ohio Controlling Bd., 137 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Iris Y. Gonzalez, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Iris Y. Gonzalez, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 Ohio St. 3d 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cleveland-right-to-life-inc-v-state-of-ohio-controlling-ohio-2013.