State ex rel. Cleveland Engineering Construction Co. v. Duffy

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 755
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Cleveland Engineering Construction Co. v. Duffy. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 Ohio St. 96
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1925·No. No. 18896·Published

Opinion

DAY, J. ’

’ An agreement between employ ér and employee to subriiit themselves to 'the' provisions of the Wbrkrh'en’s Conip ensatio'n Act ; in ’the event .of injury-to the éiñployee cannot confer jurisdiction-' upon 'the '.Industrial •' Commission to- grant’ relief unejer 'such*' 'ap't; for' injuries;-oic-. curririg in a" purdly*' maritime’ émpl'oyméht which employment has direct relation 'to 'commerce ándrnavigation over'which a court' of admiralty has''"jurisdiction.' ■■ A- wijft ;of •'mandamus' "seeking- tó-compel'- the '■ Industrial "Commission to entertain such1''jurisdiction, 'should be denied. >r '!V" ' ;

Writ deniedlis

Johesj-Matthias] 'Kinkade* iahd,'Robirtsari'/-jjr., concur. Marshall, CJ., and -Alien; J.,’"dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Cleveland Engineering Construction Co. v. Duffy, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 755 (Ohio 1925).

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 755 (State ex rel. Cleveland Engineering Construction Co. v. Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.