State ex rel. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Zupancic

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Zupancic

93 Ohio St. 3d 1278

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 10, 2001

Docket01-1356

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1278 (State ex rel. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Zupancic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Zupancic, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1278 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ and schedule oral argument on the same date as in 01-1009, Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals Nos. OO-K-1751 through 00-K-1758. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ and schedule oral argument on the same date as in 01-1009, Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals Nos. OO-K-1751 through 00-K-1758. Cook, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cleveland-elec-illum-co-v-zupancic-ohio-2001.