State ex rel. Clement v. Grzezinski

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Clement v. Grzezinski

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 4, 1952

DocketNo. 32934

StatusPublished

This text of 158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22 (State ex rel. Clement v. Grzezinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Clement v. Grzezinski, 158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22 (Ohio 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole question presented to this court for determination is whether the Court of Appeals was in error in assessing one-half the costs to each the relator, and the respondent.

Section 12296, General Code, gives to the court discretion in assessing costs, and the record in the instant case does not disclose an abuse of that discretion.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI