State ex rel. Clay v. Ohio Disciplinary Counsel

696 N.E.2d 601, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1982
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1998
Docket98-1063
StatusPublished

This text of 696 N.E.2d 601 (State ex rel. Clay v. Ohio Disciplinary Counsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Clay v. Ohio Disciplinary Counsel, 696 N.E.2d 601, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1982 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 N.E.2d 601, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-clay-v-ohio-disciplinary-counsel-ohio-1998.