State ex rel. Clark v. State

56 So. 3d 953, 2011 La. LEXIS 417, 2011 WL 893007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 La. LEXIS 971
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 24, 2011·No. No. 2011-KH-0136·Published

Opinion

In re Clark, Christopher Louis; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 09-CR3-103283; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW1541.

Relator represents' that the district court has failed to act timely on a writ of habeas corpus filed on or about July 21, 2010. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Clark v. State, 56 So. 3d 953, 2011 La. LEXIS 417, 2011 WL 893007 (La. 2011).

56 So. 3d 953 (State ex rel. Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.