State ex rel. Clark v. State

610 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 142, 1993 WL 13763
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 20, 1993
DocketNo. 93-KH-0008
StatusPublished

This text of 610 So. 2d 824 (State ex rel. Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Clark v. State, 610 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 142, 1993 WL 13763 (La. 1993).

Opinion

In re Clark, Albert Chur; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 247-571.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about October 3, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 142, 1993 WL 13763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-clark-v-state-la-1993.