State ex rel. Clark v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Clark v. State

538 So. 2d 602, 1989 La. LEXIS 535, 1989 WL 17060

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 1, 1989

DocketNo. 89-KH-0454

StatusPublished

This text of 538 So. 2d 602 (State ex rel. Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Clark v. State, 538 So. 2d 602, 1989 La. LEXIS 535, 1989 WL 17060 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Clark, Albert;—Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 247-571.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about November 7, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Clark, Albert;—Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 247-571.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about November 7, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 So. 2d 602, 1989 La. LEXIS 535, 1989 WL 17060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-clark-v-state-la-1989.