State ex rel. Clark v. Devery

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Clark v. Devery

1998 Ohio 392, 82 Ohio St. 3d 378

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 22, 1998

Docket1995-2316

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 392 (State ex rel. Clark v. Devery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Clark v. Devery, 1998 Ohio 392, 82 Ohio St. 3d 378 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 378.]

[THE STATE EX REL.] CLARK, APPELLEE, v. DEVERY, ACTING ADMR.; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Clark v. Devery, 1998-Ohio-392.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 95-2316—Submitted May 26, 1998—Decided July 22, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94APD10-1526. __________________ Zwick Law Offices Co., L.P.A., and James P. Proctor, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 378.]

[THE STATE EX REL.] CLARK, APPELLEE, v. DEVERY, ACTING ADMR.; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Clark v. Devery, 1998-Ohio-392.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 95-2316—Submitted May 26, 1998—Decided July 22, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94APD10-1526. __________________ Zwick Law Offices Co., L.P.A., and James P. Proctor, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 392, 82 Ohio St. 3d 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-clark-v-devery-ohio-1998.