State Ex Rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnell

169 So. 657, 125 Fla. 251
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 3, 1936·No. Case 2 — Electric Power System·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.-

-This: .is a companion' case • to that other case entitled State of Florida ex relatione City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Relator, v. A. C. MacConnell, as City Clerk of-City, of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Respondent, the only difference being that the revenue' certificates in.this case are sought to be issued against the net = revenues of an electric power [252]*252system while in the other case they are sought to be issued against the net revenues of a water supply system. See Williams v. Town of Dunnellon filed this term.

On authority of the opinion and judgment in the above mentioned case and cases therein cited, the motion to quash should be denied and the peremptory writ of mandamus should issue and it is so ordered.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnell, 169 So. 657, 125 Fla. 251 (Fla. 1936).

169 So. 657 (State Ex Rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. City of Deland
185 So. 343 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Brooks v. City of Jacksonville
173 So. 365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)