State ex rel. City of Reynoldsburg v. Banks

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. City of Reynoldsburg v. Banks

307 N.E.2d 260, 37 Ohio St. 2d 56, 66 Ohio Op. 2d 159, 1974 Ohio LEXIS 189

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1974

DocketNo. 73-418

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 307 N.E.2d 260 (State ex rel. City of Reynoldsburg v. Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. City of Reynoldsburg v. Banks, 307 N.E.2d 260, 37 Ohio St. 2d 56, 66 Ohio Op. 2d 159, 1974 Ohio LEXIS 189 (Ohio 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The warrant submitted to respondent for his signature having been specifically authorized by an ordinance of city council and being regular and valid on its face, respondent was required by law to sign it. R. C. 733.43 and 733.44. Payment is, therefore, a ministerial duty of respondent.

Relator having shown a clear legal duty on the part of respondent to sign the warrant submitted to him pursuant to the ordinance of February 12, 1973, mandamus will lie to compel respondent to sign such warrant.

As to respondent’s counterclaim, there is no showing by respondent of any clear legal duty on the part of the city of Reynoldsburg to pay his counsel fees and costs of this action.

Accordingly, the writ of mandamus is allowed directing respondent to sign the warrant authorized by the ordinance of February 12, 1973, and respondent’s counterclaim for attorney fees and costs is dismissed.

Writ allowed.

0 ’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, YY Brown and P. Brown, JJ.? concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI