State ex rel. City of Peerless Park v. Young

Missouri Court of Appeals

State ex rel. City of Peerless Park v. Young

988 S.W.2d 142, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 489

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 13, 1999

DocketNo. 74704

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 988 S.W.2d 142 (State ex rel. City of Peerless Park v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. City of Peerless Park v. Young, 988 S.W.2d 142, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 489 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of Peerless Park, the city’s may- or, and two of its aldermen (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County affirming the action of the St. Louis County Council disincorporating the City of Peerless Park pursuant to Section 79.495, RSMo 1994. Appellants argue that pursuant to Section 72.400(2), the disincorpo-[143]*143ration of a city is a boundary change and is subject to the provisions of the Boundary Commission Law and that disincorporation pursuant to Section 79.495 RSMo is therefore erroneous.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of Peerless Park, the city’s may- or, and two of its aldermen (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County affirming the action of the St. Louis County Council disincorporating the City of Peerless Park pursuant to Section 79.495, RSMo 1994. Appellants argue that pursuant to Section 72.400(2), the disincorpo-[143]*143ration of a city is a boundary change and is subject to the provisions of the Boundary Commission Law and that disincorporation pursuant to Section 79.495 RSMo is therefore erroneous.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

988 S.W.2d 142, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-city-of-peerless-park-v-young-moctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack