State Ex Rel. City of Lakewood v. Bernsteen
This text of 156 N.E. 213 (State Ex Rel. City of Lakewood v. Bernsteen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, reversed, for the reason that it appears that the city of Lakewood, on August 23, 1926, enacted an ordinance requiring the board of elections of Cuyahoga county to place upon the ballot for adoption or rejection by the electors of said city, at a special election on November 2, 1926, in the city of Lakewood, an amendment to the charter of said city, providing, among other things, for the Manager plan of city government; that a certified copy of the ordinance was filed with the board of elections of Cuyahoga county, Ohio, which was returned with the advice that the proposed ordinance could not be submitted to the electors on *723 November 2, 1926, because such submission would conflict with the Ohio Constitution and with the charter of the city of Lakewood, inasmuch as November 2, 1926, is the general election day for state and county officers; and it further appears that the selection of said day for the said special election, under the record herein, violates no provisions of the Constitution of the state of Ohio nor of - the charter of the city of Lakewood.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 N.E. 213, 115 Ohio St. 722, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 722, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-city-of-lakewood-v-bernsteen-ohio-1926.