State ex rel. City of Hamilton v. Public Utilities Commission

226 N.E.2d 113, 10 Ohio St. 2d 172, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 168, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 386
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1967·No. No. 40693·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions raised by respondent in this action were determined in the foregoing injunction case in Butler County. Relator was a party to that action and respondent, although not a party, upon appeal appeared as amicus curiae in the Supreme Court. Furthermore, the real party interested in sustaining respondent’s position in this case is Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, which was a party in the Butler County case. Under such circumstances, the issue is res judicata.

The demurrer is overruled, and the writ of prohibition is allowed.

Writ allowed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. City of Hamilton v. Public Utilities Commission, 226 N.E.2d 113, 10 Ohio St. 2d 172, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 168, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 386 (Ohio 1967).

226 N.E.2d 113 (State ex rel. City of Hamilton v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related