State ex rel. City of Bremerton v. Yakey

123 P. 13, 68 Wash. 284, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1282
Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 30, 1912·No. No. 10266·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to require the respondent to request the governor of the state of Washington to call another judge of the superior court of the state to Kitsap county, to hear and try certain cases, pending in the superior court for that county, wherein it is claimed the respondent is disqualified to act as trial judge. The respondent has made a very full, and complete return to the alternative writ; and upon a careful consideration of the same, we are satisfied that the litigants and attorneys in the superior court for that county have not been seriously delayed or inconvenienced for lack of judges to try their causes. It appears that, from time to time, judges from other counties have been called by the respondent and that there has been no real necessity to apply to the governor to designate any judge for the purpose. Moreover, it is admitted by the relator’s reply to the respondent’s return that the matter in controversy no longer exists, and that since the issuance of the alternative writ, a judge from another county has, on the request of the respondent, held court in Kitsap county, and that the trial calendar of the superior court for that county is now practically clear.

The alternative writ is discharged, and the proceeding dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. City of Bremerton v. Yakey, 123 P. 13, 68 Wash. 284, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1282 (Wash. 1912).

123 P. 13 (State ex rel. City of Bremerton v. Yakey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Bar of Nevada v. Sexton
184 P.2d 357 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1947)
State ex rel. Hunter v. Crocker
271 N.W. 444 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1937)
State ex rel. Carpenter v. Superior Court
131 Wash. 448 (Washington Supreme Court, 1924)