State Ex Rel. City Loan & Savings Co. v. Zellner

13 N.E.2d 235, 133 Ohio St. 263, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 263, 10 Ohio Op. 345, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 413
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 9, 1938
Docket26661
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 13 N.E.2d 235 (State Ex Rel. City Loan & Savings Co. v. Zellner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. City Loan & Savings Co. v. Zellner, 13 N.E.2d 235, 133 Ohio St. 263, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 263, 10 Ohio Op. 345, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 413 (Ohio 1938).

Opinions

Day, J.

This case presents the question of the *266 right of a clerk of courts to refuse to accept for filing a bill of sale for a motor vehicle where such instrument is not accompanied by the prepaid tax receipts required by statute.

This right is claimed by the clerk of courts under the provisions of Section 6310-10, General Code, 116 Ohio Laws, 59 (now Section 6290-5), the pertinent portion of which read as follows:

“Each corporation * * * or person from whom title has in any manner been passed to a motor vehicle shall present to the clerk of courts of the county in which the sale, transfer, conveyance, gift or passage of title is consummated within three days immediately thereafter, both copies of the duplicate bill of sale. It shall be the duty of the clerk of courts to refuse to accept for filing the duplicate bill of sale if such instrument is not executed and witnessed according to the provisions of this act or if the duplicate bill of sale is not accompanied by the vendor’s portion of the prepaid tax receipts required by Section 5546-3 of the General Code and the purchaser’s portion of such prepaid tax receipts are not affixed to the owner’s copy of the bill of sale. It shall be the further duty of the clerk to ascertain that such prepaid tax receipts are so affixed and presented and to void such stamps in a manner prescribed by the tax commission. Provided, however, that in the following cases such stamps need not be affixed: * * *
“2. When the vendor is not regularly engaged in the business of selling motor vehicles. * * *”

Section 5546-3, General Code, provides:

“Excepting as provided in Section 5546-5 of the General Code, the tax imposed by Section 5546-2 of the General Code shall be paid by the consumer to the vendor in every instance, and it shall be the duty of each vendor to collect from the consumer the full and exact amount of the tax payable in respect of each taxable sale, and to evidence the payment of the tax *267 in each case by cancelling prepaid tax receipts, equal in face value to the amount thereof, in the manner and at the times provided in this section, to wit:
“(a) If the price is, at or prior to the delivery of possession of the thing sold to the consumer, paid in currency passed from hand to hand by the consumer or his agent to the vendor or his agent, the vendor or his agent shall:
“1. Collect the tax with and at the same time as the price.
“2. Immediately cancel in the presence of the buyer by immediately tearing into two parts a prepaid tax receipt or receipts of the proper face value, deliver one part of each such cancelled prepaid tax receipt to the consumer or his agent, and retain the other part thereof.
“ (b) If the price is otherwise paid or to be paid, the vendor or his agent shall, at or prior to the delivery of possession of the thing sold to the consumer, cancel or cause to be cancelled by tearing into two parts prepaid tax receipts equal in face value to the amount of the tax imposed by this act. Thereupon and thereby the amount of the tax with respect to such sale, payment of which to the state is evidenced by such cancellation, shall become a legal charge in favor of the vendor and against the consumer, which shall in every case be collected by the vendor, as herein provided, in addition to the price; and at or immediately after such collection, the vendor shall deliver one part of each such cancelled prepaid tax receipt to the consumer and retain the other part thereof.
“In case the tax does not apply to a sale, the consumer must furnish to the vendor and the vendor must obtain from the consumer a certificate in proper form, indicating that the sale is not legally subject to the tax herein imposed. The certificate herein required shall be in such form as the commission shall by regulation prescribe, and in case no certificate is furnished *268 or obtained prior to the time the sale is consummated, the tax shall apply.
“However, no certificate need be obtained or furnished where the item of tangible personal property sold is never subject to the tax imposed regardless of use.”

Section 5546-2, General Code, imposes “an excise tax * * * on each retail sale made in this state of tangible personal property on and after the first day of January, 1935, with the exceptions hereinafter mentioned and described, as follows: * * *

“The taxes hereby imposed shall apply and be collected when the sale is made, regardless of the time when the price is paid or delivered. * * *
“The tax hereby levied does not apply to the following sales: * * *
“7. Casual and isolated sales by a vendor who is not engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property. * * *
“For the purpose of the proper administration of this act and to prevent the evasion of the tax hereby levied, it shall be presumed that all sales made in this state are subject to the tax hereby levied until the contrary is established. ’ ’

Relator contends that the clerk of courts had no right to refuse to accept the bill of sale for filing, and bases its contention on the grounds that, first, relator is not a vendor “regularly engaged in the business of selling motor vehicles”; second, the sale is “casual and isolated”; and third, relator is not a vendor “engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property.”

Let us first consider the contention that relator is not “regularly engaged in the business of selling motor vehicles.”

Section 5546-2, General Code, provides that until the contrary is established “it shall be presumed that all sales made in this state are subject to the tax hereby *269 levied.” In view of this presumption, it was incumbent upon the relator to establish that it is not a vendor regularly engaged in the business of selling motor vehicles, in order to come within the exception of Section 6310-10(2), General Code. However, relator failed to establish this fact. The agreed statement of facts does not disclose any facts on the question whether the sale here involved is the only sale or merely one of a succession of sales of motor vehicles made by the relator. Not having a factual basis upon which to determine whether relator is a vendor regularly engaged in the business of selling motor vehicles, we are obliged to resort to the statutory presumption and hold that the sale is, under this issue, subject to the tax.

.

The contentions that the sale is “casual and isolated” and that the relator is not a vendor “engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property” will be considered together, since they are interrelated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claugus Family Farm, L.P. v. Harris
2025 Ohio 2807 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2025)
CB&T Operations Co. v. Tax Commissioner of the West Virginia
564 S.E.2d 408 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2002)
Oberlander v. Porterfield
277 N.E.2d 198 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1971)
Bonnar-Vawter, Inc. v. Johnson
173 A.2d 141 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1961)
Green v. Pederson
99 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Union League Club v. Johnson
115 P.2d 425 (California Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 N.E.2d 235, 133 Ohio St. 263, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 263, 10 Ohio Op. 345, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-city-loan-savings-co-v-zellner-ohio-1938.