State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Spaeth

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Spaeth

93 Ohio St. 3d 1237

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 21, 2001

Docket01-1271

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1237 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Spaeth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Spaeth, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1237 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of the motion of Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys’ Association to file an amicus curiae motion in support of respondent’s motion to dismiss,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion he, and hereby is, granted, and that the amicus curiae motion be filed within ten days of this entry and that relator file any reply within ten days after the motion is filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of the motion of Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys’ Association to file an amicus curiae motion in support of respondent’s motion to dismiss,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion he, and hereby is, granted, and that the amicus curiae motion be filed within ten days of this entry and that relator file any reply within ten days after the motion is filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cincinnati-enquirer-v-spaeth-ohio-2001.