State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Pike Cty. Coroner's Office

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Pike Cty. Coroner's Office

2017 Ohio 573, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1405

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 22, 2017

Docket2016-1115

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 573 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Pike Cty. Coroner's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Pike Cty. Coroner's Office, 2017 Ohio 573, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted and briefing schedule set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, O’Neill, and Fischer, JJ., concur. French and DeWine, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted and briefing schedule set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, O’Neill, and Fischer, JJ., concur. French and DeWine, JJ., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 Ohio 573, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cincinnati-enquirer-v-pike-cty-coroners-office-ohio-2017.