State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Lyons

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Lyons

986 N.E.2d 1020, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1430

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 2013·No. 2013-0300·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. An alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause. Kennedy, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. An alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause. Kennedy, J., not participating.

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Lyons, 986 N.E.2d 1020, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1430 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

986 N.E.2d 1020 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Lyons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.