State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Joyce

768 N.E.2d 1183, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1476

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Joyce. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Ohio St. 3d 192 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 30, 2002·No. 2002-0318·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon determination pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondents’ motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file its brief within 10 days after the filing of evidence; respondents shall file their brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 5 days after the filing of respondents’ brief. •

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon determination pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondents’ motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted.

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Joyce, 768 N.E.2d 1183, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1476 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

768 N.E.2d 1183 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Joyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.