State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept.

116 N.E.3d 1287, 2019 Ohio 470, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1507
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 13, 2019
Docket2017-1618
StatusPublished

This text of 116 N.E.3d 1287 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept., 116 N.E.3d 1287, 2019 Ohio 470, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1507 (Ohio 2019).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On relator's motion for oral argument. Motion granted.

O'Connor, C.J., and Donnelly and Stewart, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 N.E.3d 1287, 2019 Ohio 470, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cincinnati-enquirer-v-cincinnati-police-dept-ohio-2019.