State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Bd. of Edn.
781 N.E.2d 1016, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1407
This text of 781 N.E.2d 1016 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Bd. of Edn.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Bd. of Edn., 781 N.E.2d 1016, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1407 (Ohio 2003).
Opinion
In Mandamus. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination and respondents’ answer.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relator’s R.C. 149.351 civil-forfeiture claim be, and hereby is, DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, GRANTED on relator’s R.C. 149.43 claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Board of Education
99 Ohio St. 3d 6 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
781 N.E.2d 1016, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cincinnati-enquirer-v-cincinnati-bd-of-edn-ohio-2003.