State ex rel. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

824 N.E.2d 1008, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1477
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 30, 2005·No. 2004-1874·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. On S.CtPrae.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed as moot. See State ex rel. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 105 Ohio St.3d 177, 2005-Ohio-1150, 824 N.E.2d 68.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 824 N.E.2d 1008, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1477 (Ohio 2005).

824 N.E.2d 1008 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related