State ex rel. Churchill v. Trubey
This text of 33 N.W. 554 (State ex rel. Churchill v. Trubey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The status of this case, and of the association proceeded against as unlawfully exercising corporate franchises at [98]*98the date of filing the information, was precisely the same as in the case of State v. Critchett, ante, p. 13, (decided at this term of this court,) and the decision mast be the same as in that case, to wit, that at the filing of the information the respondents had no authority to assume or exercise corporate franchises. Whether or not the respondents have since that date properly organized as a corporation, and acquired the right to exercise corporate franchises, is not in question in this proceeding, and cannot be passed upon.
Judgment for the state.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 N.W. 554, 37 Minn. 97, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-churchill-v-trubey-minn-1887.