State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial Commission

751 N.E.2d 477, 92 Ohio St. 3d 431, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 2100
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 8, 2001
DocketNo. 00-2355
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 751 N.E.2d 477 (State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 751 N.E.2d 477, 92 Ohio St. 3d 431, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 2100 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Coolidge, Wall, Womsley & Lombard Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey D. Snyder and Nicholas E. Davis, Jr., for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Armbrust, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. E.S. Gallon & Associates and Richard M. Malone, for appellee Ernest Sizemore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.
2001 Ohio 215 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
751 N.E.2d 477, 92 Ohio St. 3d 431, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 2100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-chrysler-corp-v-industrial-commission-ohio-2001.