State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

2000 Ohio 305, 88 Ohio St. 3d 225
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 Ohio St. 3d 158
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 21, 2000·No. 1998-1912·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 225.]

THE STATE EX REL CHRYSLER CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; MAJEWSKI, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-305.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-1912—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD02-270. __________________ Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas J. Gibney and Margaret A. Mattimoe, for appellant. Fell, Marcus & Koder Co., L.P.A., George N. Fell II and Lisa A. Grego, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 305, 88 Ohio St. 3d 225 (Ohio 2000).

2000 Ohio 305 (State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.