State ex rel. Christopher v. Taft

787 N.E.2d 1226, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1559
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 7, 2003
Docket2003-0509
StatusPublished

This text of 787 N.E.2d 1226 (State ex rel. Christopher v. Taft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Christopher v. Taft, 787 N.E.2d 1226, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1559 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent Governor Bob Taft and motion for judgment on pleadings. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ and expedite proceedings. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 N.E.2d 1226, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-christopher-v-taft-ohio-2003.