State ex rel. Christopher v. Brunner

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Christopher v. Brunner

923 N.E.2d 157, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1515

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 16, 2010·No. 2010-0466·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for expedited issuance of an alternative writ,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for expedited issuance of an alternative writ is denied. The parties shall follow the schedule provided by S.CtPrae.R. 10.9 for the presentation of evidence and briefs.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would grant the motion. O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., would defer ruling on the motion until a responsive memorandum has been filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for expedited issuance of an alternative writ,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for expedited issuance of an alternative writ is denied. The parties shall follow the schedule provided by S.CtPrae.R. 10.9 for the presentation of evidence and briefs.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would grant the motion. O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., would defer ruling on the motion until a responsive memorandum has been filed.

State ex rel. Christopher v. Brunner, 923 N.E.2d 157, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1515 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

923 N.E.2d 157 (State ex rel. Christopher v. Brunner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.