State ex rel. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Hanft
23 N.W. 308, 32 Minn. 403, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 179
This text of 23 N.W. 308 (State ex rel. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Hanft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Hanft, 23 N.W. 308, 32 Minn. 403, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 179 (Mich. 1884).
Opinion
The uniform doctrine of this court is that the writ of certiorari will not lie where there is an adequate remedy by appeal. This garnishee had that remedy, and the writ is accordingly dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Scheffer & Rossum Co. v. Kane
174 N.W. 884 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1919)
State ex rel. Wischstadt v. Olson
57 N.W. 477 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1894)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 N.W. 308, 32 Minn. 403, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-chicago-st-paul-minneapolis-omaha-railway-co-v-hanft-minn-1884.