State ex rel. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Hanft
23 N.W. 308, 32 Minn. 403, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 179
Opinion
The uniform doctrine of this court is that the writ of certiorari will not lie where there is an adequate remedy by appeal. This garnishee had that remedy, and the writ is accordingly dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Hanft, 23 N.W. 308, 32 Minn. 403, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 179 (Mich. 1884).
23 N.W. 308 (State ex rel. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Hanft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Scheffer & Rossum Co. v. Kane
174 N.W. 884 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1919)
State ex rel. Wischstadt v. Olson
57 N.W. 477 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1894)